(888) 569-9499CONTACT US
0Item(s)

You have no items in your shopping cart.

Product was successfully added to your shopping cart.

FCC

  • TWRS-27 - Skiing With Radios

    We talk about using two way radios while skiing. We also review the Cobra MicroTALK CXR825 two way radio.

    Intro :00
    Billboard 1:19

    Topic Discussion 1:35
    In this episode We'll discuss the advantages of taking radios with you on ski trips, things to consider when using them on the slopes and offer some recommendations as to which radios are best to take along. Radios discussed include the Midland GXT1000VP4, Cobra microTALK CXR925, Motorola TALKABOUT Two Way Radios and the Midland SZ1B Sub Zero Black Ear Warmer Stereo Headset. For more information about using two way radios on ski trips, read Taking a Ski Trip? Take a Radio and Two Way Radios For Skiing.

    Commercial Break 18:46
    buytwowayradios.com 1:00

    Product Review 19:44
    Today we review the Cobra microTALK CXR825 Two Way Radio.

    Questions and Answers 25:52
    Questions from readers of our Two Way Radio Blog and members of the Two Way Radio Forum.

    FCC Narrowbanding Announcement 30:54
    For more information read FCC DA 12-12.

    Wrap up and Close 32:34
    Send in your comments and questions for Danny, Anthony and Rick to show(at)buytwowayradios.com. Feedback on this and other topics will be read by the hosts and included in future episodes of the show. Visit us at www.twowayradioshow.com!

    © 2012 Cricket Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.


  • TWRS-26 - 2011: The Year in Review

    Today we take a look back at the year 2011 in the world of two way radio communications. We also review the new Midland SZ1B HD Sub Zero Stereo Ear Warmers.

    Intro :00
    Billboard 1:23

    Topic Discussion 1:39
    In this episode We'll discuss some of the news and events that shaped two way radio history in 2011, some of the new products launched during the year and products that were retired or discontinued in 2011. Radios discussed include Motorola CLP Series, DTR550, MS350R, MR350R VP, Midland GXT5000, Vertex VXD720, VXD 7200 and Uniden MHS125 Submersible Handheld Two Way VHF Marine Radio.

    Commercial Break 17:09
    buytwowayradios.com 1:00

    Product Review 18:07
    Today we review the new Midland SZ1B HD Sub Zero Stereo Ear Warmers.

    Questions and Answers 25:34
    Questions from readers of our Two Way Radio Blog and members of the Two Way Radio Forum.

    Wrap up and Close 33:15
    Send in your comments and questions for Danny, Anthony and Rick to show(at)buytwowayradios.com. Feedback on this and other topics will be read by the hosts and included in future episodes of the show. Visit us at www.twowayradioshow.com!

    © 2011 Cricket Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.

  • Getting Started with Marine Radios

    One of the most important things to have with you when you are out on the water (besides something to keep you afloat) is a means of two way communication, such as a radio. If you are a boater, you probably already know how important it is to have a radio on board.

    Marine VHF radios are commonly used on seafaring vessels both large and small to communicate ship-to-ship or ship-to-shore for everything from routine contact with ports and marinas to emergency distress calls. These radios operate using VHF frequencies from 156 to 174 MHz.

    Marine radios operate very much like your typical land-based two way radio, but with some differences in channels, wattage, range and features. VHF marine channels are different than those used for land based radios and are specifically for use in marine environments. They are allowed to operate between 1 and 25 watts. Because transmissions primarily occur over open water, their range will generally be much greater than land-based radios.

    Marine radios also offer many additional features not found on most land-based radios, such as emergency weather alerts and weather-proofing. It is not uncommon for marine radios, particularly handheld units, to be submersible in water and even float.

    One important feature often found in a VHF marine radio is Digital Selective Calling, or DSC. DSC is part of the Global Maritime Distress Safety System (GMDSS). A Class-D (DSC) Digital Selective Calling-capable VHF radio has a second receiver to monitor Channel 70 (DSC channel) activity at all times while receiving another channel. DSC allows the user to send a distress signal at the push of a button without using a microphone to exchange position information with other boats or stations. As of March 25, 2011 marine radios are now required by the FCC to be Class-D DSC complaint.

    The FCC has set specific requirements for users of marine radios operating within US jurisdiction. The FCC states: Depending on the size, purpose, or destination of a ship, its radio station must meet certain requirements established by law or treaty.

    On October 25, 1996, the FCC released a Report and Order in WT Docket No. 96-82, 11 FCC Rcd 14849, FCC 96-421 (pdf), eliminating the individual licensing requirement for voluntary ships operating domestically which are not required by law to carry a radio. Voluntary ships are those that are not required to have a radio. WIth a few exceptions, most recreational vessels are considered voluntary.

    According to the FCC, domestic vessels are those that do not travel to foreign ports. If your vessel travels to ports in other countries, you will need to have a license. The FCC rules require certain vessels to be equipped with radio equipment for safety purposes. These rules are set in accordance with international agreements.

    Marine radios typically have 88 channels, however not all of those channels are allowed to be used by everyone. Certain channels are reserved for specific types of communications or for specific groups, such as commercial ships and the Coast Guard. For instance, Simplex channels, 3, 21, 23, 61, 64, 81, 82 and 83 CANNOT be legally used in U.S. waters by the general public. Channel 16 and Channel 9 are emergency channels and are reserved specifically for emergency communications. Channel 16 (for voice) and channel 70 (for digital DSC) being monitored 24 hours a day by the US Coast Guard.

    In addition to the other requirements, there is one other very important rule to note: Marine radios are specifically intended for marine use. It is illegal to operate a marine radio on land.

    There are two basic types of VHS Marine Radios, fixed mount and handheld. Fixed mount radios are installed or mounted in your vessel. Handheld radios are carried with you like any other handheld two way radio or walkie-talkie.

    Examples of fixed mount VHF marine radios are the Icom IC-M412 (available in black or white) and the Cobra Marine MR-F80B-D Class-D Fixed Mount Submersible VHF Radio. Examples of handheld marine radios are the Midland Nautico 3VP, and the Icom IC-M36 VHF Marine Radio. Cobra, Icom, Midland and Uniden are all popular brands of marine radios.

    When shopping for a marine radio, it is important to note that while antennas are typically included with handheld radios, an antenna is not included with fixed mount marine radios and are purchased separately. This is because the antenna will be mounted somewhere externally on the vessel itself. Marine radio antennas vary in size, length and type and your choice of an antenna may vary depending on where and how it will be mounted on your vessel.

    For more information about the basics of choosing and using a marine radio, listen to The Two Way Radio Show Episode 16 - An Introduction to Marine Radios.

  • TWRS-12 - The Migration to Narrowband

    In this episode we discuss the the FCC's new 2013 narrowbanding requirement and what it means for users of business two way radios.

    Intro :00
    Billboard 1:13

    Topic Discussion 1:29
    We talk about the FCC's 2013 narrowbanding mandate. We will clarify what this means, help you determine if this mandate will impact your business, and if so how to move forward. For more information about the new FCC requirement, read A Summary of the FCC's Proposed Changes to GMRS and Other Services in the Two Way Radio Blog.

    Commercial Break 17:45
    buytwowayradios.com 1:00

    Product Review 18:43
    Today we will review the Olympia P324 business radio.

    Questions and Answers 24:55
    Questions from readers of our Two Way Radio Blog and members of the Two Way Radio Forum.

    Wrap up and Close 28:57
    Send in your comments and questions for Danny, Anthony and Rick to show(at)buytwowayradios.com. Feedback on this and other topics will be read by the hosts and included in future episodes of the show. Visit us at www.twowayradioshow.com!

    © 2011 Cricket Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.

  • What We Told the FCC

    Danny has posted our comments to the FCC about the proposed changes to GMRS and other services. You can read our comments over on the FCC website. Time is also running out, so we encourage all of you to enter your comments today if you have not yet done so.

  • Response to the FCC's Review of the Part 95 Personal Radio Services Rules

    Here is draft of the response we are going to submit to the FCC:

    "This letter contains comments on the Notice Of Proposed Rule Making And Memorandum Opinion And Order On Reconsideration in the matter of the FCC's Review of the Commission's Part 95 Personal Radio Services Rules (WT Docket No. 10-119).

    First, a little background about myself. I am the president of Cricket Ventures, LLC which owns and operates the web site BuyTwoWayRadios.com, one of the country's largest GMRS specialty retailers. I would like to briefly voice my support in the FCC taking up this matter and provide comments on certain subjects that were mentioned in your Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM).

    I am in full agreement with an overwhelming majority of your proposed changes, in particular your proposal to remove the license requirement for GMRS use. This issue has been the cause of much confusion and discouragement from our customers over the years and I welcome the changes taking effect. I have comments on several other sections of your proposal that I will detail below.

    Page 6, Item 12:

    You propose to list frequencies in a table along with an assigned channel number. I believe that it is a great idea to use channel numbers to identify frequencies, however I would suggest that the FCC adopt the channel numbers that are commonly used by radio manufacturers in 15 channel GMRS radios. Example radios are the Kenwood TK-3101, Kenwood TK-3131 and the Icom F21-GM. I believe that if the FCC uses channel numbers that differ from current standards it will only lead to confusion.

    Page 12, Item 27:

    It is my opinion that all GMRS licensing requirements should be eliminated. As stated in the proposal, licensing offers little value when a licensed user is able to operate on any frequency in any location. In addition, it is inconsistent with other part 95 services. Also, with so few GMRS users actually completing the licensing process this requirement actually serves only to punish those who follow the rules. This would continue to be the case without a large enforcement effort, a near impossibility with the number of unlicensed stations already in use.

    Page 13, Item 30:

    The proposal seeks comment concerning the use of GMRS devices by businesses. It is my opinion that use of GMRS radios by individuals for business purposes should continue to be allowed. A potential drawback to this is that with the possible removal of the license requirement, some businesses may choose to use GMRS radios rather than part 90 commercial products because the part 90 licensing process creates a barrier to entry. I do believe however that there are sufficient advantages to the Part 90 service that businesses will continue to choose LMR products for high use and mission critical applications. Businesses may choose to use lower cost GMRS radios in light duty or non-frequent applications.

    I also believe that prohibiting business use of GMRS devices would be difficult to enforce and would likely lead to a situation like we have today with licensing, where those that follow the rules are effectively punished because breaking the rules involves no risk.

    Page 19, Item 47:

    I understand and support the stated concern regarding combination Marine/GMRS radios and I support prohibiting this combination. It is my opinion, however, that the proposal may be taking it too far by including Part 90 in the list of prohibited combinations (along with Parts 80, 87, and 97).

    There is some consumer demand for high quality business grade GMRS radios, but this demand is very small in comparison to the demand for the typical low priced combination FRS/GMRS radios found in retail stores. Business radio manufacturers say that this demand is too low for them to justify producing a GMRS specific radio. A typical Part 90 certified UHF radio is no different from a hardware perspective from a high quality GMRS radio. Providing the manufacturer with the option to produce a radio for businesses but also having it certified for GMRS use could provide consumers in need of higher end products with more options. Without this option, those looking for high quality, commercial grade GMRS products may have very few choices."

    We welcome your comments and opinions so let us know what you think by commenting here on our blog or on our two way radio forum.

  • Uniden in Trouble with the FCC, Stop the Scramble!

    Oh FCC, how you tease us with wanting to be all nice and open, then turn around and start handing out fines for something that is honestly, not that important - or even work the way many would have you think. It would seem that Uniden is now in the same trouble Midland found themselves in for selling GMRS radios with voice scrambling. Every now and then there are rumors that the GMRS radio market is just not that attractive anymore to many radio manufacturers. I wonder why...

  • Your Turn With the FCC!

    Everyone involved with two way radios has their own unique relationship with the FCC. Very simple rulings can have a cascading impact on the radios that are designed and sold, and how people use them. There is a lot of debate out there about licensing, GMRS, and even the future of digital radio communications.

    There are a lot of areas that have different effects on all of us. To keep this straight, the FCC not so long ago, promised to be more open and transparent. Well, it would seem for now they are keeping this promise. As detailed in this article, the FCC has a new search engine for researching filings and also for sending them your own comments about a proceeding. You can even set up an RSS feed.

    This is a very small step though. The FCC has a lot of things to address in the world of two way radios. Making their website into a more useful tool is a move in the right direction.

  • The FCC is Still Wanting an Open Relationship

    This post covered some of this already, but there is a bit more information in this article in the Wall Street Journal. Over at the FCC they are still pushing to overhaul their processes and also make everything more open to the public. They are also probably going to do some restructuring along with making what they do more accessible. According to the WSJ news story:

    Genachowski repeatedly says he wants the FCC under his watch to be more "data-driven," "fact-based," and "transparent" than ever before.

    I think anyone that has been involved in getting a business radio license would love to see the process improved. Also, for the hobbyist, having more direct dialogue with the FCC about common concerns (GMRS pricing) may lead to a more common sense approach in fees. This may even help the radio manufacturers avoid certain, er, events.

    Many have stated that the FCC is backwards, bloated, and perhaps absolutely meaningless now. I am not sure if Genachowski is trying to justify the agencies existence, or is genuinely interested in making it into a lean, effective regulatory agency. At the minimum I hope we at least get a more communicative organization that is easier to work with.

  • Speaking of the FCC, Who is the New Boss?

    Besides going after Midland Radio, they are also getting all settled in with a bunch of new people over at the FCC. So besides being all grumpy and giving out fines, the new Federal Communications Commission Chair Julius Genachowski wants to make the FCC more open and efficient. The folks over on ars technica have a good write-up on all of the new people at the FCC.

    The new FCC administration now wants to be open, and "smart about technology"? A lot of people feel that it is one agency we should just get rid of. They can be more focused on fines and petty agendas than doing honest regulatory work. One could argue that the FCC has been more of an impediment to implementing new technology than a help. Perhaps they will get rid of GMRS licenses, or even streamline the process for a business radio license. This should be interesting.

Items 21 to 30 of 31 total

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

CUSTOMER REVIEWS